What is the multiple choice answer for your daily work?

A) is for APPLE

B) is for BIKE

C) is for CARROT

D) is for DRUM

E) is for EVERYTHING above.

F) is for I FORGET!

How much air time do plants get? Do you think it's less than they used to get? Maybe they have evolving flyers that will someday rule the sky! We already know about windborne organisms but is that truly an airborne flyer or a halfway between gliding and falling? It would be hard to track miniscule organisms lighter than air but it leaves the possibilty open that they are as good as our best balloonists. Maybe a few genetic varieties are good at filtering air! Imagine that 'a plant fall in the garden' instead of a waterfall! A few varieties of kamakaze aerialists that attack pollution could really find a use around factories. A smoke extinguisher would be useful if you could get plants able to chase plumes, on a bigger exponential maybe a set of plants and organisms to chase toxic spills and radiation.

I can't understand how anyone would think egyptians pulled rocks on dry land when obviously a bunch of logs would make a better raft to float in your rock canal roads, lifts and pools. But I guess it wouldn't have been the first time that a limited vision group got in charge of wealthy activity.

Thoughts seem to take time with incoherent listeners or with the bubble bursting babblers! It's long been known that a new patch wont suit an old hole without some settling or curing and I find it odd that applies to human reason. Each person seems to employ a list of environmental elements that make new things more palatable for the known reasonings whether rational or not. Even personally I find reading older works is done with a greater perspective than the most fresh controversial ideas! I also feel that leaving written work for a longer time reveals more editing mistakes because my present mind isn't as congruous with what was really written and what the intention is. It's the same with a published blog for me that looks immediately different after publishing because a different facility of my thoughts seems to immediately start along a publicly critical path.

Note 1: Hot air means colder Earth!

Note 2: Hotter air cycles upwards to disperse or convect back down.

Note 3: A multitude of small thin reflector satellites could be very controllable, transportable and disposable.

 

Solution: Divert light into a point of focus from numerous focally graded satellites to a place in the atmosphere. Initially using variations of light intensity at particular convection system points worldwide to heat air which will change composition due to excess heat and cycle more rapidly aiding the natural processes almost halted by global warming.

 

Choosing the reception point of heat  will enable the natural cleaning of air to be enhanced in areas where warm currents are vital. Numerous intensities, cycles and colors could be varied to create designer solutions for more specific problems.

The bonus is that the usage will have follow on effects in humanities abilities to alter significant weather and Earth phenomena. (Too scary for most!) The numerous benefits of such a system would greatly outway the drawbacks. Each country could own its respective reflectors to manipulate power generation, crops, weather conditions and scientists could do more than observe degrading factors in the longer term.

 

Even if adverse areas were identified it may be so minimal that compensation could be arranged due to world benefit in such remote and uninhabited places without significantly alterable habitats.

Obviously light selection could include sesitive areas such as poles and particular hot zones. But strangely a rainforests oxygen production might be enhanceable by increasing canopy light in a vegetation growth optimization.

 

Specifically night lighting for cities could occur by solar power!

When you stay in the country you might notice a house in a tight valley gets less Sun! Inversely the sky scrapers in the city light up with sunlight  for either dusk or dawn. A modern way to incorporate daylight saving might be to eclipse the Dawn and the dusk in summer but invert the focal for winter. Basically exxagerating any long series of shadows into a partial eclipse could apply to anywhere in the world with huge faces of surface area absorbing heat.

 

I wonder if a water fountain at eight kilometres high could put the plug back into a weather phenomena? (Maybe water doesn't have a magic solution?) Another question; If the black roads are added together as surface area then does the world now present a blacker front to the Sun? (Maybe not a climate changing one!) Should ice at the poles be shaved by robots to near glass perfection continuosly and then cut with a perfection sun reflection angle? (Whats the angle of th Sun at the poles? Maybe robots don't get enough solar juice to do anything fantastic!) Should roads only present grip to the back of a tire on the road and cars just use reduction braking with anti-lock-up monitoring? (Maybe pedestrian areas would get a phenomenally slow  speed limit due to new technology fears!) Should we start more swamps in moderate climates; or massive sun dial lochs with sea water in desert areas?

I've never seen a glasshouse for water project similar to those biospheres for plants, maybe we need a few to protect as much water whilst using renewable power to produce weird results; ice on roof at night, pressurized hot water on the roof in the day time, condensed air entrapment from exterior walls, speed testing projectile water tesioned lengths between polluted and non polluted to allow wind power to select sufficiently clarified water. Any of the magic of water phenomenas that could possibly yield a modern equivalent to our required solution! Can human made flying water really do as much a the climate naturally available? (Bit of a daisy chain starting to emerge on this thought line!)

I get the feeling that most people don't think of sea locations half as much as they think about a big bowl of drink, or a big series of Bermuda triangles. Navigational equipment aside I would have expected a lot more location clarity about the medium and depths in our age and havent really been pressed to memorize a list of names of sea locations I'm totally unfamiliar with despite the probable existence of many such lists. I have noticed much better maps of nearly everything else available, maybe I need to look harder if I'm really interested but I just dont expect to hear much about sea location worksites beyond a few pinpricks on the news with references to the nearest landmass, no highways, ferry routes, flight paths etc. Or those big balloons that shade sea locations instead of geographical outlines including borders. Maybe I'm looking at it all too anecdotally!

This is weird but the ultimate chess strategy is to have your king killed in a few moves that refuse any further destruction of the kingdom. A surrender option that requires the opponent to play into your tragedy! So Macbeth huh? Most idiots play well past their defeated moment with vain hopes, all at the cost of the arrayed battlers. (It sort of proves that Chess is a dumb game with little option for intelligence.) Obviously the next best strategy would be to kill your opposing king before his army has moved; immediately forced surrender. Lifes not like that at all!

Teaching children is like spending your time using your other hand, if your theories are useless on technique then you will spend considerable time reviewing a series of disasters. Some people naturally give it a go an pass stuff on easily by example whereas others quickly decide to let a professional handler take due care from now on! Instantly I realize this is more of a long haul operation for me! Even gifted children can seem a bit awkward and don't develop anywhere near the rate an adult would but if your timings in then they brilliantly blast past each hurdle. Same with my left side antics, sometimes disaster strikes despite all intensive efforts but at other times I get all my theory and practice in such a transferable state that my left side shows all the natural charm of a completely green teenager hitting the field and scoring on his debut! (Come back in a week and my left side will have forgotten everything and will seem adverse to the idea of participation in the offense.)

If a virus or bacteria is carried by another organism such as an insect do we really care about the side effects of the drugs we could administer to the insects? If mosquitos are willing to land on animals carrying  a disease; why don't we rub down some animals with analgesics of the malaria destruction variety, who cares if the insects lunch was a bit off? Invite entire swarms nightly and daily to a feast in attracting vibrating heat and dowse them in antibacterials! Why bother trying to scare them away when we could attract them to where we aren't personally but are definitely in spirit? Perhaps they could become as useful to humans as leeches once were but now as a delivery vehicle to the entire diseased animal kingdom.

Quantum Journalist

 

If a journalist going into a disaster brought the news to the victim on the victim’s best options for an achievable recovery of all lost things or how to expect the best possible response from the universe, would the world cope better after tragedies?